Security Prisoner
Security Detainee
Administrative Detainee
HCJ 9961/03, 639/04 The Association for Civil Rights in Israel et al. v. Commander of IDF Forces in the Judea and Samaria Area - Response on behalf of the State
Court Documents | 9961/03 | 13.11.2006
In its response to the petitions of HaMoked and ACRI on the illegality of the separation wall's permit regime, the state expands on the permit regime and provides data on the scope of land expropriations for the wall's construction; the number of residents affected; the number of permits issued for entry to the "seam zone" and its gates and passages. On the legal aspect, the state claims the "seam zone" was proclaimed a "closed area" on security grounds and the subsequent permit regime form an integral part of the separation-wall construction project and meet both Israeli and international law, and that both petitions are general and so should be rejected outright.
HaMoked’s response to the state’s position in the petition against the permit regime implemented by Israel in the “seam area”: The regime creates a clear separation between Israelis and holders of Israeli visas and Palestinians from the Territories and as such, constitutes the crime of apartheid (02) 627 1698   (02) 627 6317

red-id | רד אינטראקטיב