|
|
|
|
|
HaMoked together with other Israeli human rights organizations petition the court: the Ministry of Interior must promptly process family-unification status requests of Palestinians harmed by the recently expired Citizenship and Entry Into Israel Law
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign Press, Elizabeth Dwoskin and Shira Rubin / The Washington Post | 16.7.2021
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign Press, Al Jazeera | 12.7.2021
|
|
With the failure of the law’s renewal, more Palestinians will begin the arduous and expensive process of applying to Israeli authorities to obtain residency rights for their West Bank spouses.
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign Press, The Times of Israel staff | 11.7.2021
|
|
Order reportedly given to halt the paperwork as officials wait to see if minister Shaked will again try to pass legislation that blocks marriage as a path to citizenship
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign Press, Jeremy Sharon | 8.7.2021
|
|
Following the government’s failure to renew the Citizenship Law this week, some 13,000 Palestinians married to Israeli citizens can start naturalization process to obtain citizenship.
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign Press, Isabel Kershner / The New York Times | 6.7.2021
|
|
In an early setback for Prime Minister Naftali Bennett, parts of his coalition opposed the law. The opposition refused to come to the rescue.
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign Press, Aaron Boxerman / The Times of Israel | 3.7.2021
|
|
Israel says measure stopping Palestinians from becoming citizens through marriage is key for security, but critics lament toll on family life and ask if justification still holds
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign Press, Dahlia Scheindlin | 24.6.2021
|
|
For 18 years, Israeli governments have backed a law built on faulty security arguments, explicit demographic engineering and pure human suffering. The Bennett coalition seems set to prolong ruining Palestinian and Israeli lives
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Supreme Court declined to review the legal definition of “Resident of the Area”: to evade a principled hearing, the State undertook to “favorably consider” upgrading the status of a young Jerusalemite represented by HaMoked
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HaMoked to the Supreme Court: The Citizenship and Entry into Israel Law should not be applied to people who are not registered as residents of the oPt and for years have no ties there
|
|
|
|
|
Application | 7065/20 | 16.10.2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Precedential judgment against the Minister of Interior: a Palestinian woman living in East Jerusalem for years in the framework of family unification procedures cannot be denied an upgrade in residency status, due solely to actions of her son
|
|
|
|
|
Judgment / District Court | 13708-3-20 | 8.7.2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Local Press | 20.8.2019
|
|
After Israel’s refusal to let Congresswomen Rashida Tlaib and Ilhan Omar enter Israel, Tlaib submitted a request to enter on humanitarian grounds, to visit her elderly grandmother in the West Bank. Interior Minister Aryeh Deri accepted the request, but on several conditions unacceptable to Rashid.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HaMoked in a letter of protest to the Minister of Justice and the Attorney General: the last-minute appointment of new judges to the Appeals Tribunal during election period is highly improper
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HaMoked to the High Court of Justice: Residents of the oPt who have been lawfully living in Israel for years, must be given permanent status after they reach their sixth decade. In the absence of any security claim against them, there is no justification to the continued infringement of their rights
|
|
|
|
|
Local Press, Amira Hass | 9.1.2019
|
|
Judge rules that Mustafa Khatib's mother was not responsible for his 2015 attack against Israeli forces, says expelling her would violate her rights
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign Press, Amira Hass | 9.1.2019
|
|
Judge rules that Mustafa Khatib's mother was not responsible for his 2015 attack against Israeli forces, says expelling her would violate her rights
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Court for Administrative Affairs rejects State's appeal: the mother of a teenage assailant, who is suspected of nothing herself, cannot be deported as a “deterrent”, or “punishment” or due to “parental responsibility”. The Minister of Interior must base his decision “on pertinent considerations”
|
|
|
|
|
Judgment / District Court | 3.1.2019
|
|
|
|